blog.McEagle.com

The question is, if you get information “psychically or through remote viewing” that might be useful to someone in power, do you tell them?

Of course not! My recommendation would be not to do it, unless you want an FBI case number after your name and a permanent file in their regional data bank where someone will go to it every time something really screwy happens and ask to look at his “nut-balls” listing, to see if anything cross references to you — because that’s exactly where you will end up and that’s exactly what will happen.

You could volunteer your information in some secretive way? Actually, that could prove to be much worse. What if you turn out to be right? If you are correct, then you are automatically suspected as involved and every effort will be made to hunt you down since you did deliver the information secretively. And since they have had to hunt you down, you are now automatically considered a righteous suspect, or at least until you are totally cleared (preferably by alibi.) Take my word for it. Out of any given 100 investigators, and I’m talking hard-core investigators, maybe two would believe you got it in your dreams or psychically in the first place, so you still get the case number and go in the nut-bag file drawer until you’ve solved at least five or six cases.

This is probably something not worth doing unless they come and ask you for it first. This means you must first develop a track record of some significance.

(Ding!) I heard that from the back of the room. “Gee, how do I do that if no one will ever listen to me or use me in the first place?” Great question!

Basically, it’s called sink or swim. You jump in. Ignore everything I just said. If you think you are that good and the information is that good, you pick up a phone and call someone at your local FBI Regional Headquarters and give them your name. You tell them you are a psychic [don't try and explain remote viewing, they don't care about it] and you have information you feel is important. Then you give them the information. They take it and put it all in the “Nut-bag File.” If it comes true, they will show up at your door and you will be seriously interviewed and asked where you were and what you were doing when it occurred. I hope you have a great alibi for where you were when it happened.

Now, you keep doing that, until you’ve established a track record that contains more accurate information than inaccurate information, at which point they will then take you out of the “Nut-bag File” and give you a confidential informant number, and may actually accept your phone calls. However, and this is critically important you hear this because I will only say this one time. If you tell anyone you are working for the Government or the FBI, and they find out you said that, you will go permanently into the “Nut-bag File” and they will never speak to you again. The rule is; if you talk about their business, they will have no business to do with you. And that is the same with every law enforcement agency I’ve ever had any knowledge of.

And, there is one louder and more significant word of warning that is even more important when it comes to important people in power and that regards the President of the United States. Never mess with the President unless you are absolutely, 100%, solid-gold positive about your information and can back it up with a track record that is Platinum-clad. The Secret Service is an organization that does not muck about or play games with anyone about anything at all. You do not want to go into their “Nut-bag File.” Once you go in, you do not come out.

There is one other comment I would add here. If this is a game you want to play in, then you can’t be just good at it, you must be very, very good at it. Because there are people in power who play on more than one side of the street and they do so simultaneously. Sometimes they even play on more than one street at a time. If you cannot see that psychically along with the information you are choosing to deliver, you may be playing in a very awkward game and be in for some very uncomfortable surprises.

As many of you know, I can be somewhat humorous when speaking. In the past, I have sometimes referred to remote viewing within the halls of government, the law, or bureaucracies as more like a ‘knife fight in a phone booth’ (then of course everyone titters and laughs.) But, no matter how many laugh whenever I make that statement, I’ve never made it to be funny. It’s absolutely true.

Regarding the question on fuel processing plants overseas – when the successful strike is made by terrorists on the fuel processing plants in Saudi Arabia, the world will know it — that’s what I was primarily talking about. Our current glut of cheap gasoline is hardly very interesting to me or anyone else, since it suddenly appears right at “voting” time. They’ll find reasons to raise the price immediately after you punch in your votes.

The idea that they have processed too much fuel for cars and trucks here at home and have to lower the cost to get rid of it seems to be a ridiculous concept to me. The sudden release in reserves simply dropped prices like a rock just prior to National Elections — oh, duh! There could be other reasons, like other suppliers manipulating our voting process as well, but we’ll never know because we have no real news source we can trust any longer. It’s our own fault of course. The larger portion of the general public that chose to change their channels to “Hardcopy” rather than pay attention to real news, which is what drove real news collection by real reporters overseas completely off the air, has demonstrated real democracy in action.

We simply get what we ask for, while those who own things continue to chase the cheaper end, all the while raising costs, and walking off to the bank with all the cream off the top. Sheep are sheep and sheep shearers are and forever will remain sheep shearers.

We’ve really victimized ourselves here because the crushing demands on two working adults in every family now trying to make ends meet has made our time very precious to us. Trying to take the time to understand what’s actually going on is no longer even possible. We the public have demanded shorter and shorter sound bites from the nearly non-existent news media. When we tuned to “Hardcopy,” we tuned out our much needed support to worldwide news bureaus at a time they most required it. They were shut down, consolidated, traded off, or eaten up in the resultant buyouts. The long histories of cooperation, trust, and deep seated connections they had throughout the world were permanently severed. They no longer have access to the news they need to keep us informed. They aren’t there anymore.

Now we demand news that no one can provide. In our anger at being bilked, we now listen to or watch the radical radio or television shows that give us what we want to hear or see, what makes us comfortable, at a time when we are feeling even more stressed and afraid. So, now as a public, we are systematically being broken up into groups of radically-thinking bigoted idiots, and we haven’t got a clue that’s even happened to us. We’ve stopped critically thinking for ourselves because we haven’t time for it.

We go to churches where Crusades are being preached against major elements of our own countrymen, at a time when we should be coming together to weather the storm. And by the way, this isn’t a new crisis folks. Terrorism of this kind has been with us since the mid-sixties or long before that. What’s changed is that back then and up until 9/11 it was fought clandestinely and the average American just didn’t hear about it. And of course the numbers were much smaller back then — or were they? Has politicizing terrorism raised it to hero status and increased its financial and recruitment support a multi-mega-fold? I suggest it has.

First, look at the numbers. There were lots of terrorists back in the eighties. If you doubt my word on this, I suggest, no, beg that you at least obtain and look at one of the copies on “International Terrorism in the 1980s — A Chronology of Events” There are two volumes. Volume !, 1980 — 1983, and Volume II, 1984 — 1987, [Mickolus, Sandler, and Murdock; Iowa State University Press, 1989]. They both list hundreds of terrorist organizations and literally thousands of terrorists events, many of which occurred right here in America, many of which killed American citizens in their homes and work spaces. It went on for decades and no one apparently was aware even though it was public data. Now suddenly the war is public and the data is classified. Go figure! And now that terrorism has been politicized many of the groups who wouldn’t have been caught dead cooperating in the 1980s will now. There’s now an unending supply of volunteers for the terrorists ranks because the label “Freedom Fighter” has attained a heroic or an almost mythical reputation in some areas of the world. And the level of monitory donations to the cause has gone off the charts, where before they were lucky to find enough cash to eat day to day.

What’s my point? Well, a decision was made soon after 9/11 to turn it into a public “War on Terror,” which began to use your “gut level induced fear” to change things in America. What things? How you live your life and how you feel about your guaranteed freedoms under the Constitution. For instance; there are illiterate people of color in this country who have never missed a chance to vote. They live on land given to their family, family’s, family’s, family who were originally slaves, and this can be proven in a court of law. Of course they can’t afford to prove it because they hardly make enough money to pay the taxes on it from year to year. Many of them no longer drive and they certainly do not own passports, but our Congress and Senate who have bought the old fashioned model for what fighting a war means, is currently attempting to change the law, which will require these people to provide proof they are United States Citizens. A ridiculous notion when they’ve not changed their address for nearly 200-years.

There are also mountain people, desert dwellers, ranch hands, farm workers, migrant workers, crop pickers, cutters, shearers, harvesters, herders, miners, diggers, day laborers, unskilled carpenters, and I could go on — basically your below minimum wage American poor who are legal citizens of this country who are about to be disenfranchised, not because they don’t have a drivers license or can’t prove where they live, but because they might not be able to obtain a birth certificate or never owned a passport.

I learned a very long time ago, in a number of other wars, where we tried to instill Democracy. When you counter terrorism, you counter it from the bottom up, not the top down. If the people begin to feel policed, oppressed, and controlled, then they will begin to feel terrorized and afraid. The disenfranchised and unemployed poor are the very ripe recruiting grounds for terrorists. In order for any terrorist to operate they need to live among the people. If they can’t, they cannot hide, they cannot survive, and they will eventually fail in their mission. You need the cooperation of the people, especially the people at the bottom of the totem pole.

You go first and foremost to the people for help to counter terrorism you don’t change the laws to control the people. That’s something I do not believe our government has come to understand yet. They’ve not spoken to anyone in this country about what they need from us that’s of a positive nature, they’ve not asked for the help of the American people, they’ve not treated us with respect, and they haven’t provided or issued a single positive letter of guidance to help reduce the fear which they carry much of the responsibility for having created. Enough said.

I spent nearly 30 years of my life with the US Government. We were basically using intelligence to chase bad guys. Not just Communists, but terrorists, human smugglers, gun runners, pirates, dope shippers, and all kinds of criminals outside the country who were trying to do harm to our nation. They were also trying to do harm to other nations as well — NATO countries, Asian Countries, even some of our less fortunate Communist neighbors. When I say bad people, I’m talking about the kind of people who will chain-saw you up alive, dissolve you in a tub of acid, and dump you in a sewer, that kind of bad people. They operate or attempt to, in places where the governments aren’t strong or are just being birthed, where people are trying to learn to rule themselves, whether or not it is a socialist, democratic, republic or rule by monarchy. Most of these governments have growing problems which aren’t pretty. They include graft, lying, cheating, bribery, kidnapping, rape, stealing, murder, and all the other petty and not so petty crimes that go along with the kinds of change that take place when a country goes from bad to good.

It’s a learning process and bringing in the “law” and making it work, that is “enforcing it,” is a tough job. It’s messy and a nasty business. Not something most people volunteer for. Mistakes are made frequently, and good things frequently happen as well. But eventually good wins out and peace is made and things settle down and a new nation is born, and everyone eventually forgets how things were in the “good old days” of the nation’s birth. And so it was with our Nation, and so it is with many others. In a lot of cases, in fact, in many, they don’t even want help while they are going through that process — it interferes with the guys who are in power and early on that means they can’t skim as much off the top. So, sometimes you have to help them anyway you can.

What I find ironic, is that so many people go to so such extremes to gouge out the scabs and sores which are barely healed from the birth of their own great nation’s beginnings, and want so dearly to pick at them, even before they have allowed the concrete in their great countries foundation to solidify. They want to lay blame everywhere except where it truly belongs. For it is far more important to build their own “great history” in the beginning at the expense of other nations, than it is to accept fault for their own failings.

I spent a lot of time in the service of my country overseas in many places in the world helping to Nation-build. In many of those places today, people can walk on a sunny day without fear, and speak their minds freely and openly without recourse. A lot of good Americans died so they can do that. I now sit quietly and listen to some of these people in the exercising of their freedom of speech say a lot of nasty things about America and Americans that simply isn’t true. But they are nation-building. Right on! They are creating a history they can be proud of, albeit by perhaps forgetting what part America played in their freedom by relegating America to a darker role in it. That’s okay.

What it does point out to me, however, is the fact that I did spend all those years doing that for a lot of other people in the world, and now I sit here, retired, in my own home in Virginia, watching my own freedoms being threatened. Freedoms I risked my life to provide to those people in other lands. I now have to ask myself, if I will calmly sit here in my home and give up those very freedoms I fought so hard for, for others, and calmly let go of them without so much as a word or a whimper. I don’t think so. I think it’s time for Americans to begin to worry about and protect their rights under the Constitution. It is time to begin to think about fighting to retain those rights, even if it means fighting al-Qaida or others on our own streets. It’s time to insure whoever you are voting for in the coming election is someone you can trust to protect those rights, as guaranteed by the Constitution. If you aren’t sure, ask them outright. Make them give you an answer, or don’t vote for them. I fought overseas and was willing to die for those rights for others. So I sure as hell am not going to give them up here in my own country without a fight.

JM

Once many moons ago, I took photographs of two French helicopters landing in a clearing near a rice paddy to re–supply and air–evacuate wounded North Vietnamese soldiers from a battle which was raging on the other side of a mountain valley just across a border. The helicopters were clearly being flown by Frenchmen; at least they were speaking French to the Vietnamese and to one another. That was circa–1967.

If my memory serves me correctly, it wasn’t too many years earlier that the United States stood by the French and supplied them in their fight against the North Vietnamese up to and through the truce which resulted in the repatriation of French fighters who otherwise would have been lost to POW camps at Dien Bien Phu.

Also, my same memory is the CIA played a major part in much of that action, albeit covertly, as well as much of what lead up to it on behalf of the French. I’m making a serious point here, because that specific agency along with some others, has taken some serious historical hits for past actions in a number of countries vis-à-vis hindsight.

I’ve also looked through the lens of my camera and taken photographs of American GIs who at times appeared to be collaborating with the enemy. Were they? I haven’t a clue. But if I’ve learned one thing over the years, it’s this — things are never what they seem. If you believe they are, then you are probably naïve and the Intelligence business shouldn’t be your first choice for work. Secondly; just because I saw Frenchmen flying a helicopter behind the lines in Vietnam, didn’t give me cause to write off the entire country of France and all of the people in it.

I get hundreds of web sites recommended to me on a weekly basis as places to go to for the ultimate truth. I check a lot of them out because I do search for the truth, even knowing full well how illusive it can be. Few carry it. Almost without exception, they are selling something that appears to be “truth” wrapped in a very fine veneer of mystical illusions, slightly twisted half truths, and of course encased in a lot of very well crafted omissions. It is their version of how they would like you to believe it actually happened, when it is not that way at all. “You don’t believe me,” they say, “then check the facts” – and they give you facts that are checkable, but which have no actual bearing on the issues they are selling you — the true reality, the reason why it happened in the first place, or the context behind the act.

What you will usually find is that explaining something in hindsight is far easier than explaining why something happened in reality. All the proceedings leading up to the event or the action, the very nexus for actions causation within space/time are sometimes so complex as to defy explanation. They are impossible to understand, even if you were standing there and observing them as they occurred. If you doubt that, then try explaining how you happened to fall in love with someone on first sight. It just happens. There is no explaining it.

Actions are sometimes a nexus of events that come together only one time in history, a complex issue of events that result in something happening, usually under extreme duress or pressure of events at the time which cannot be explained even when all the facts are known. You cannot go back and study them in hindsight and say this is why it occurred and this is who is at fault. Unless you were standing in the room, or taking part in the action, you have no business commenting, and even then making a judgment call is a complete impossibility.

So, how, then, can someone say the President made a mistake invading Iraq?

There are a number of things America has had in its favor in the view of the world court. In the past, America has occupied and maintained the “high ground.” America has tried to work well with its world neighbors, never taking major actions without first consulting with its major allies. America has typically had a good foreign policy. And lastly; America has never taken any action of war without first debating it across the aisle within the House and Senate, and reaching a consensus.

In the case of the invasion of Iraq; America gave up the higher moral ground by invading a nation for no good reason (or at least a shallow manufactured one). Yeah, yeah, I too heard all the arguments — and even saw some of the pictures — the Spetsnaz moved them at the last minute. They were all shipped into Syria or Iran. What the Spetsnaz moved into Syria were munitions for use by the insurgents. And if anyone believes for a second that there weren’t special teams swarming all over the locations that WMD materials would have been stored in the second they crossed the borders . . . well, you need lessons in military tactics. There were NONE. They — multiple agencies — looked hard, before, during, and after the invasion and none were ever found. End of story.

We did so (the invasion) without the consent of our allies. And I know many of you are thinking — what? The French, Germans? Give me a break. All they knew how to do was drag their feet. Well, that’s an interesting attitude to take since they were staunch allies for sixty years against the Communist hoards across the eastern borders. They let us park our tanks, planes, and people in their countries, cities, parks, and towns, drink their wine, beer, and trash their pubs, marry their women, and call them friends and buddies for quite some time against a common European enemy. But, they suddenly don’t agree with us when their intelligence tells them the same thing our intelligence is telling us and we dump them very dishonorably on their asses in a major public way. I sat in mud holes with a lot of those guys. I’ll watch your back, you watch mine. And suddenly we have an attitude and we don’t need their sage advice anymore. Give me a break.

We’ve basically had no foreign policy, or at least no explainable one, for eight years; and the war was never debated across the aisle. It was forced down the throat of the minority membership of both the House and the Senate, outraging 48% of the American people.

We are now entering WWIII and the Administration hasn’t seen fit to alert the American People. I understand this, as I’m sure a large portion of my neighbors do.

But all that is a past nexus. Who the hell knows who was in the room when all that went down, or who was actually making the decisions? Alas, we do have another nexus coming. There has been nothing but an atmosphere of fear raised by the Administration and absolutely no action taken to give a positive direction to the American people on what they can do to help either the country or themselves to prepare for what is coming. The American people are waiting for guidance and there has been none forthcoming, just more in the way of directives on what is being taken from them — bit by bit.

I will wait and see how the Administration explains the sudden shift in gasoline from $3 to $6 a gallon, or perhaps explain why we’ve made the direct attacks on Iran? And I think the American people are just about pushed to the limit on what they are willing to give up in the way of personal freedoms. The raw edge of the Constitution is becoming a bit frayed. Maybe it’s time to take a serious look at what’s been taken so far under the odor of fear.

Was it Osama’s plot or wasn’t it? No, of course it wasn’t! This was a bunch of guys out of Pakistan who put it all together because they are half-smart and thought they could get away with it. They wanted to mimic al-Qaida, pay their dues, and join the brotherhood. These are some of the major problems you get when you stop fighting terrorism clandestinely and push it into the public eye and make it both a political as well as a public issue.

Terrorist recruitment skyrockets, and financial donations to their cause are expanding beyond belief. Splinter groups who couldn’t find their butts in a dark room forget their differences and begin to coordinate with one another, and our beloved media jump on every little detail to inform them about what they did wrong when they are caught, so they can learn from their mistakes, so they never make the same mistakes twice.

Over time, all the terrorist groups who watch the TV, take detailed notes and improve their tactics to professional levels of efficiency. We are soon forced to begin making choices between our freedoms of speech, or . . . ten lives for every free word spoken. Either that or giving in to our own form of radical response, which only leads to unbelievable blood-letting and the irresponsible deaths of huge numbers of innocent people, just because they hold a common belief.

What is Osama really up to?

It’s very clear to me what he is up to; I have passed this along both piecemeal as well in large chunks to my friends over the past year, so I might as well pass it along here, too. It is my strongest belief that al-Qaida has already crossed our southern border from Mexico as much as six to eight months ago. They crossed in groups of four to six operatives, and as many as six to eight groups. That would be 24 to 48 operatives. So, I would settle on approximately 36 operatives being currently in country. I believe they are targeting four major cities. And they are targeting the choke-points in those cities, which are the main intersecting road junctions where the main highways intersect which go from east to west and north to south, carrying primary traffic on our Nation’s highways.

Their plan is to detonate large bombs in tractor trailers surrounded by dirty nuclear materials, essentially vaporizing these materials and spreading them over a large area, making these areas hot and useless for a very long period of time. This would basically kill and harm hundreds of thousands of people and shut down our Nation’s road systems in four major cities. I obviously haven’t named these cities for a reason. If I’m correct, I’m a target. If I name them, I might create a lot of panic. Unlike the news media, I choose not to give these guys any information of value, so al-Qaida and their wannabes, can go screw themselves!

I fought a number of wars. In one of them we had our problems — Mai Lai, as an example. Yes, and we burned villages. But we burned them to deny the enemy sustenance, and we provided new buildings, land, gardens, and places for the people to live, where they could be protected from the VC and NVA. I know, because I carried babies and young children to safety in my arms, while being shot at. But the media didn’t film those parts of the story, because we were, after all, being shot at. It was an ugly war we shouldn’t have been in, in the first place. But we soldiers were, and 95% of the American military did their jobs professionally and honorably, and a lot of good men and women died because they fought it that way . . . for years — until somebody woke up and pulled them out of there.

I don’t believe it’s necessary to remind anyone that it was the American people who decided by election who was in office, and who was in office decided the policies, and it was the policies that ran the war for all those years.

Policy or the lack of policy is in action at this moment right now in Iraq, where they can’t tell the radical from the moderate Islamic believer. No one can tell until the bomb goes off in their face? But know this: just as before — 95% of our guys are fighting the war honorably and professionally, and they are dying in a place where they shouldn’t be. The rest of us are sitting back here in the comfort of our homes, talking about the merits of why blood-letting should be going on there instead of in our back yards. It’s become an intellectual pastime for the majority of the American public.

It’s time to wake up. Let’s bring them home. If it means we have to fight in our backyards, so be it. Maybe we need to renew our fight for the freedoms we have enjoyed so long here in our great country. Too many Americans talk about their freedoms and don’t really understand what it means to fight and die for them — al-Qaida does!

To answer just two questions I’ve noticed from the Blog.

Using Hemi-Sync™ on an iPod shouldn’t be a problem. The effect is that you are simply storing the digital Hemi-Sync onto a digital iPod system. Hemi-Sync went from analog to digital a long time ago. The difficulty of moving from analog to digital with Hemi-Sync originally had to do with technology in the earlier stages of digital, and had more to do with refresh rates, square wave, and just how much of the analog signal was being converted. But nowadays it’s no longer a problem that needs to be dealt with. Current chip sets are way fast enough to make it something you do not need to worry about.

The other question had to deal with Osama and if our Government really wanted to catch him or not, or whether they have taken him off the want list at all. I’m not sure that really matters. When our government decided to invade Iraq, they basically created dozens of new Osamas which we now have no specific names or locations for, so it has become a moot point. Before the Iraqi war we probably could have identified all of the known terrorists. That’s no longer possible. So, one Osama here or there hardly matters any more. We have enough terrorism to keep us busy for the next 100 years. Osama will die a forgotten old man in a cave somewhere. It’s the young, completely unknown terrorist with Bush Fire on the brain, we have to worry about now. Before we started trying to democratize the entire Middle East, they were harder to recruit. Not so anymore.