Plus, the fact that Tarot card readers and Brit psychics were used in the 1960s were able to SEE and report the corruption in the U.S. military to their handlers besides answering the actual ‘test’ questions being asked and were therefore not employed further.

Cognitive Sciences Lab where Ed May and James Spotiswoode work lost $500,000 one tme because they let slip the word ‘Tarot’ into one of their grant applications to the CIA/Congress.

Again, we all know that the term ‘remote viewing’ is simply the rephrased phraseology of normal psychic workers. The terms were invented by Ingo Swann and Hal Puthoff in order to be able to write up ’science’ study grants in the field which bible belt thumpers could not understand and therefore cancel.

Puthoff and Swann both went on from parapsychology labs on the east coast to actually utilize what had been learned. These labs, like the Russian bureaucrats wanted still more research to go on till the end of time. But Puthoff and the KGB told these labs and their stunted bureaucrats — that’s enough research already!! We’re happy to go with what’s been discovered and they did. White lab coats with project labels and clip-boards are cheap to rent after all.

Puthoff has or had at least an active brain and was sufficiently humble to actually ask me questions as to what I might know. That’s a professional scientist with an honest curiosity unlike the anti-science bozos in charge of these so-called documentary magazines. The New World Order provides the answers for this.

Instead, remote viewers whose pensions were on the line were expected to self-censor themselves so that embarassing facts would not get mixed in with the simple ‘test’ answers. Plus the fact that the claims made about being able to train just anyone to demonstrate these abilities was easy. Then they dropped these claims apparently. Especially due to the fact that “remote viewing training” was not the reason for the success of remote viewing. Rather, though some people are “trainable” — the original remote viewers were military individuals who were able to demonsrate psychic or paranormal abilities while operating in the field and were always able to return to base following black ops in other countries regardless of whether there were traps waiting for them because they could detect and avoid same.

Or another example would be an individual in air-sea rescue who was told to go out and pick up someone from a vast ocean, possibly a downed pilot in a dinghy and be able to pick out that spot in the ocean where he could be found strictly by instinct.

These people were just at the end of their prime but still hot stuff and were now required to fly remote viewing desks.

I would ask you Joe for your own interest not to locate Usama bin Laden who is likely dead for a couple years but rather how much Halliburton, etc. plan to steal next and/or questions along that line regarding Bush, Cheney and all the other criminals I believe to be running the U.S.

A friend of mine taped the show for me. Great job you did there. Glad to hear the extra details about the security people who happened to be on site. You know, they might actually be contacting you sometime in the near future, don’t you think? (:-)

Regards
Robert

I watched as the van traveled to the outbound site. I told my wife, “There’s the arch or short tunnel-like structure that Joe talked about during the session”, just as the van went through it. The woman who acted as the beacon was obviously impressed. All in all, it looked like a good session and all completed in-protocol.

But then the National Geographic’s resident skeptics kicked in. They started pointing around the area, saying stuff like, “Well yeah, but he didn’t say anything about this or that” and “Some of the stuff Joe described would be true of almost anywhere”, etc. I was truly disgusted.

The fact that they were really stretching, reaching as far as they could and in any way they could, to try and minimize the validity of the remote viewing was painfully obvious. Since then, I’ve watched a few other Nat’l Geographic shows about various paranormal subjects and it’s always the same thing. These people are worshipping at the temple of scientism and stopped being true scientists long ago. It’s unfortunate.
Don

Excellent!!

The impact you’ve had on even one person has the potential to profoundly change the level of awareness of many. Let’s hope those producers integrate their new awareness into their work at some stage in the future. :)

cheers
Liz

One man’s unbelief has no affect on your belief, unless of course you let it and I figure that you will not allow others to mess up your world just because theirs is so limited. ;)

Keep on keeping on Joe. There are those people around you that embrace such things as do you, so, keep on……

healthy regards to you and yours

Keep doing what you’re doing, Joe. Eventually they’ll come around!

Mark

It must be so frustrating . I’m glad you keep chipping away at it though. I don’t know what they could have expected you to do further to prove yourself.

But you know what? Anyone in the viewing audience who has had any kind of experience like that, will look at the show and it will be validated for them that it IS possible. Forget the Bozos in suits, lol!

Linda

Sometimes it seems the entire field (which, minus the marketing and hype of course, is already miniscule) is doomed from so many different angles.